Sitemap

By Georg E. Riekeles / Project Syndicate

Switzerland’s Brexit Moment

Many in Switzerland have failed to recognise that their exorbitant privileges vis-à-vis the European Union could not continue. The Swiss government’s recent withdrawal from talks on an EU framework agreement could reduce the country’s single-market access and prompt a fundamental rethink of its relationship with the bloc

The Swiss government’s recent withdrawal from negotiations on a framework agreement with the European Union has triggered a deep crisis in bilateral relations. For the EU, the fallout is manageable: economic relations will erode, but the Union will carry on. For Switzerland, the consequences could be more dramatic. With Switzerland’s future access to the EU’s single market in jeopardy, its walkout might now require a Swiss rethink of its relationship with the bloc almost as fundamental as the United Kingdom’s after the 2016 Brexit referendum.

Switzerland is not an EU member state, but in many respects it comes close. Through some 120 bilateral agreements, Switzerland is a member of the border-free Schengen Area, is closely integrated with the EU in areas such as transport, research, and the Erasmus student-exchange programme, and enjoys full access to the single market in sectors from finance to pharmaceuticals.

All told, Switzerland probably benefits more from the single market than any other European country, and pays little in return. A 2019 Bertelsmann Stiftung study found that the single market boosts Swiss annual per capita income by €2,900 ($3,515) per year – well above the EU average of €1,000 35 – whereas Switzerland’s corresponding financial contribution (when it is paid) in effect cost the Swiss less than €14 per capita per year.

Switzerland’s free lunch is not only economic. The main problem with the “bilateral way,” cherished by the Swiss since they voted “no” to the European Economic Area (EEA) in a 1992 referendum, is the lack of continuous updating of single-market law in Switzerland. Swiss public opinion has long held that “foreign judges” should have no role in interpreting the country’s laws. Yet, this clashes with the single market’s requirement of uniform application of supranational rules.

The Institutional Framework Agreement (IFA) that the EU and Switzerland reached in 2018, after five years of negotiations, was a belated attempt to put bilateral relations on a sustainable footing and pave the way for further Swiss access to the EU market. To secure it, the EU again made significant concessions in the face of Swiss sovereignty concerns.

Rather than requiring automatic incorporation of single-market law, the EU allowed for three years of internal Swiss procedures to adopt it (including possible referendums). And instead of insisting on sole jurisdiction for the Court of Justice of the European Union, the EU agreed to an arbitration-based dispute-settlement mechanism that would seek the CJEU’s intervention only for interpreting concepts of EU law.

Significantly, the EU also conceded that the IFA would cover only five market-access agreements, from transport to the free movement of persons. The 1972 bilateral free trade agreement remained off-limits, with the two sides issuing only a statement of political commitment to its future modernisation.

But despite these concessions – which would place at risk the single market’s level playing field – the Swiss government never signed the IFA, or even defended it. On the contrary, the Swiss strategy was always to come back for more – until they walked away.

This “Brexit envy” is entirely unjustified. Whereas Brexit involved the UK’s complete departure from the single market, the entire purpose of the IFA was for Switzerland to remain within it

The talks had been made difficult because of disagreements over state-aid rules. Under the IFA, the EU offered a two-pillar arrangement whereby the EU rules would apply in Switzerland but would be implemented through an autonomous Swiss surveillance mechanism with powers equivalent to the European Commission’s. But when the EU negotiated its post-Brexit relationship with the UK, some in Switzerland thought that the UK received a “better” state aid deal.

This “Brexit envy” is entirely unjustified. Whereas Brexit involved the UK’s complete departure from the single market, the entire purpose of the IFA was for Switzerland to remain within it. The even bigger thorn in the EU’s side has been Switzerland’s remonstrations against EU citizens’ freedomof- movement rights to Swiss social security benefits, and its concerns about downward pressure on domestic wage levels. Here too, the Swiss have a weak case.

Following the Swiss 2014 referendum “against mass immigration,” the EU conceded that Swiss law could require Swiss employers to give priority to domestic job seekers. The IFA grants exceptions – provided these are non-discriminatory and proportionate – to protect Swiss wage levels. And the CJEU has recognised that freedom of movement is not absolute and that economically inactive EU citizens may be excluded from other member states’ social benefits.

The EU could not concede more. Precisely because these tricky issues are not unique to Switzerland, the EU cannot give the Swiss a free pass. Treating all countries alike matters not only for the integrity of the single market, but also for the EU’s political viability. If the EU were to give non-members privileges that even members don’t have, more might head for the exit. The EU and Switzerland must find solutions within a common framework of rules, not outside them.

Many in Switzerland fail to recognise their exorbitant privileges vis-à-vis the EU, and that this cherry-picking cannot continue after Brexit. All in all, the Swiss government has shown little interest in a fair single-market settlement with the EU, and, having broken off talks, now faces some immediate economic consequences.

For starters, future single-market access in electricity and health is off the table. And on 26th May, Switzerland lost access to the EU market for new medical devices, because the EU-Swiss Mutual Recognition Agreement was not updated. Machinery and chemicals are next in line. Bit by bit, the two economies will decouple in these sectors, at an estimated cost to Switzerland of up to €1.2 billion per year.

The EU must soon make other hard choices, not least concerning Switzerland’s participation in the bloc’s Horizon Europe research programme. Research cooperation is obviously mutually beneficial. But with the Swiss holding up their financial contributions and spurning efforts to find viable institutional solutions, the EU seemingly has little choice but to put its foot down.

The EU-Swiss rupture comes as the UK government is also brazenly confronting the Union by stepping away from key provisions of the Ireland- Northern Ireland protocol and asking the EU to adapt. With Norwegian support for the EEA increasingly unstable, several of the EU’s wider economic partnerships are in play.

But it is the Swiss who face the most difficult choices. A recent opinion poll showed that more than 60% of Swiss are in favour of the IFA. But similar majorities support the EEA model, or even the model of EU-UK and EUCanada agreements.

As the Commission reminded the Swiss government after it broke off the talks, the bilateral relationship urgently needs modernising. Instead, it is now entering the unknown.

Related Articles

By Carl Bildt, Project Syndicate

The Dangerous Balkan Standstill

Even after a quarter-century of relative peace, the Balkans have yet to achieve the lasting stability that was hoped for when the region’s wars...

Comment

New Ways To Promote Good

It is time to reflect on the past 30 years of the bilateral cooperation programme and seek new paths of collaboration. Switzerland’s longstanding commitment...

H.E. Urs Schmid, Ambassador Of Switzerland To Serbia

Longstanding And Excellent Relations

My primary goal is to further deepen this relationship. I will work towards increasing the number of high-level contacts, regularly conducting political consultations and...

Majo Mićović, President Of The Swiss-Serbian Chamber Of Commerce (Sky Express General Manager)

Time For The Next Step In Supporting The It Sector

The pandemic has served to confirm the huge importance of digitalisation, while it will continue to have a significant impact on companies’ daily operations....

Štefan Vöröš, Managing Director, Star Import (Mercedes-Benz)

Committed To A Fleet Of Co2 Neutral Vehicles

Mercedes-Benz has dictated trends and set standards from the very beginning, and that continues to this day. It recently also announced the launch of...

Marinko Ukropina, SGS Group Managing Director For Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia-Herzegovina And Montenegro

Immeasurable Contribution To Combating The Grey Economy

SGS is the world’s leading company in the provision of inspection, verification, testing and certification services. It operates as a global leader and innovator,...

Branko Milikić, Managing Director Of Sixsentix Serbia

iTest Coming Soon

Sixsentix is a Swiss company that specialises in software testing and has branches across Europe. The company’s expertise is already recognised by clients, so...

Oliver Streit, Head Of The From Education To Employment Project, NIRAS - IP Consult GmbH

Supporting Young People In Finding Decent Jobs

From Education to Employment (E2E) is a partnership project between the Government of Serbia and the Swiss Government that’s building alliances between the public,...

More...

Comment by Zoran Panović

Legacy And Disquiet

By calling on the presidents of Turkey, Serbia and Croatia – Messrs Erdoğan, Vučić and Milanović – Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik (seemingly narrow-minded,...

Cvijetin Milivojević, Political Scientist

Freedom Is More Important Than Money

Alongside the concentration of economic levers of power in the hands of the Serbian progressive party, the propaganda occupation among the most influential media...

Danica Popović, Professor Of The Belgrade Faculty Of Economics

We Will Pay, Of Course

Media freedom is the first and most visible confirmation of whether or not democracy is functioning. Money is, of course, behind that, and it...

Vladimir Gligorov, Economist And Political Scientist

A Hand In The Budget Replaces Force

The advantage that those in power have – primarily the budget and propaganda – should prevail over political failures and hitherto unprecedented corruption. That...

News

Belgrade Security Forum Is A Unique Venue For The Dialogue For The 11th Time

Future of the Western Balkans is in the EU with the US as a partner, is the main message...

Belgrade Security Forum: The Drivers Of Resilience And Radicalization

Academic Panel 2: Resilience to Violent Extremism in Southeast Europe Ms. Marija Ignjatijević, Researcher at the Belgrade Centre for Security...

11th Belgrade Security Forum Opened

Deputy Head of the OSCE Mission to Serbia Ms. Sarah Groen opened Academic event of the 11th Belgrade Security Forum. In...

Virtual Investment Conference 2021, Slovenia: The Land Of infinite Potential

Slovenia ranks as one of the least restrictive OECD-member countries for FDI, doubling its FDI stock in the last...

Learning Together, Project To Support Inclusion Of Vulnerable Children

Serbia still has many children from vulnerable groups, especially children with disabilities and Roma children, that the national education...

Belgrade Security Forum Is A Unique Venue For The Dialogue For The 11th Time

Future of the Western Balkans is in the EU with the US as a partner, is the main message...

Belgrade Security Forum: The Drivers Of Resilience And Radicalization

Academic Panel 2: Resilience to Violent Extremism in Southeast Europe Ms. Marija Ignjatijević, Researcher at the Belgrade Centre for Security...

11th Belgrade Security Forum Opened

Deputy Head of the OSCE Mission to Serbia Ms. Sarah Groen opened Academic event of the 11th Belgrade Security Forum. In...

Learning Together, Project To Support Inclusion Of Vulnerable Children

Serbia still has many children from vulnerable groups, especially children with disabilities and Roma children, that the national education...

Turkey To Declare 10 Ambassadors ‘Persona Non Grata’

The move means 10 ambassadors — including those of Germany and the United States — are now just one...

Belgrade Security Forum Is A Unique Venue For The Dialogue For The 11th Time

Future of the Western Balkans is in the EU with the US as a partner, is the main message...

Belgrade Security Forum: The Drivers Of Resilience And Radicalization

Academic Panel 2: Resilience to Violent Extremism in Southeast Europe Ms. Marija Ignjatijević, Researcher at the Belgrade Centre for Security...

11th Belgrade Security Forum Opened

Deputy Head of the OSCE Mission to Serbia Ms. Sarah Groen opened Academic event of the 11th Belgrade Security Forum. In...

Learning Together, Project To Support Inclusion Of Vulnerable Children

Serbia still has many children from vulnerable groups, especially children with disabilities and Roma children, that the national education...

Turkey To Declare 10 Ambassadors ‘Persona Non Grata’

The move means 10 ambassadors — including those of Germany and the United States — are now just one...