Sitemap

More...

H.E. Carlo Lo Cascio, Ambassador Of Italy To Serbia

Friends During Both Good And Bad Times

The Italian medical team said that Serbia...

Giorgio Marchegiani, President Of The Italian-Serbian Chamber Of Commerce

Support That Works Like Magic

In this emergency situation, the role of...

Patrizio Dei Tos, President Of Confindustria Serbia

We Recognised Common Goals & Worked As A Team

Everything we achieved stems from teamwork and...

H.E. Thomas Schieb, German Ambassador To Serbia

Speed Of Accession In Serbia’s Hands

There is a danger of an imbalance...

News

Brose To Invest €180m In Serbia

Prime Minister Ana Brnabic talked today with Urlich Schrickel, Chief Executive Officer of the Brose Group, which started the...

Deyana Kostadinova Is The New UNICEF Representative In Serbia

Ms. Deyana Kostadinova is the new UNICEF Serbia Representative. Prior to this assignment, she was the Permanent Representative of the...

Coronavirus Digest: Europe Tightens Restrictions To Control Spread Of COVID-19

The Netherlands is going into a partial lockdown for at least four weeks. Meanwhile, Italy has imposed new restrictions...

Belgrade Security Forum Discussion: To Remain Committed To Values Amid Crisis

This year the Belgrade Security Forum titled “No trust – No Peace” is happening under very specific circumstances, deprived...

Ursula Von der Leyen

What EU “Geopolitical” Power Will Cost

Ursula Von der Leyen, the new president of the European Commission, has promised to position the European Union as a geopolitical power that is capable of holding its own against the United States and a rising China. But the EU may come to regret any attempt to parlay its economic strength into geopolitical clout.

With former German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen assuming the presidency of the European Commission, the European Union now has a new executive. Von der Leyen has promised to lead a “geopolitical” Commission, believing that Europe needs to be more assertive in its relations with other countries, and more hard-nosed in pursuing its own interests around the world, particularly vis-à-vis the other large powers.

Because the EU lacks an army or a central secret service, it must use economic policies to achieve its geopolitical aims. But the way Europe’s policy toolkit works in practice suggests that it is not well suited for exercising power abroad.

The EU’s most important policy tool is trade, which is one of the few areas where the bloc acts as one. The EU has traditionally run its trade policy along conventional commercial lines, with the goal of maximizing market access for European exporters and protecting certain domestic sectors (particularly agriculture). Could this policy be tweaked for geopolitical purposes?

A closer look at concrete examples suggests not. After all, the EU should be opening its markets to agricultural imports from northern Africa, to foster growth in that struggling region and stanch the flow of economic migrants into Europe. But opposition from Italian, Spanish, and other olive growers has blocked this option.

Similarly, the EU has long favored imports of bananas from key countries (mostly former colonies) that it wants to keep within its orbit. But such a policy makes little economic sense – why restrict imports of bananas from countries that can produce them more cheaply? – and violates World Trade Organization rules.

As these and many other real-world examples show, bending commercial principles for geopolitical aims simply is not compatible with a rules-based multilateral trading system, not to mention the WTO’s principle of “non-discrimination.” In fact, subordinating trade policy to a broader geopolitical agenda would require the EU to disregard the very principles that it has repeatedly pledged to uphold and defend.

Ursula Von der Leyen

Another area for the potential (mis)use of economic levers concerns Europe’s “near abroad.” Many in Europe fear that by providing cheap finance for infrastructure projects across a wide range of countries, including some EU member states, China’s “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI) is gradually encroaching on the continent’s periphery. But, again, one must ask whether this challenge justifies setting aside good-governance principles.

Consider the case of the Balkans, where the EU itself supports many construction projects. Each of these projects undergoes rigorous cost-benefit analysis, and in a mountainous region with weak local economies, the cost of building roads or railways is high. Proposals for new superhighways to connect relatively small population centers may have the support of local politicians, but they simply do not make economic sense. As such, the EU’s financing institutions – the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development – generally counsel against such projects.

Proposals for new superhighways to connect relatively small population centers (Balkan countries) may have the support of local politicians, but they simply do not make economic sense

By contrast, the Chinese have proven more than willing to build “highways to nowhere.” If the EU followed suit and started financing white elephants in the Balkans in order to keep those countries close by its side, whatever goodwill such projects initially generated would evaporate as soon as the costs of maintaining them and servicing their debts came due. Many countries that have signed up to the BRI can already attest to this.

Moreover, one must remember that better connectivity in goods, services, capital, and people along the EU periphery is not always synonymous with faster local growth. By strengthening agglomeration effects, deeper economic integration can reinforce the tendency of talented, more educated people to leave their home country for opportunities elsewhere.

The one area where the EU could feasibly leverage economic means for geopolitical ends is development aid. The EU itself is the world’s fourth-largest aid donor, and its member states collectively spend three times more on aid, accounting for more than half of the OECD’s official development assistance. The countries that receive the bulk of EU ODA – Pakistan, Syria, Afghanistan, Ethiopia, and Somalia – also tend to be the sources of the most migrants.

The EU thus has a vital interest in helping these countries prosper.

But corruption and economic mismanagement, not a lack of aid funds, are holding these countries back. So, while Europe could channel ODA to a few favored countries in a bid for influence, it would risk propping up corrupt elites who have done nothing to foster development. Meanwhile, EU money could have a significant positive impact in other countries with less geopolitical importance. If these countries miss out on funds they otherwise would have received, EU development assistance will have become less effective.

In economic terms, the EU is still of a comparable size to China or the US, which is why it is tempting to think that its economic strength could be parlayed into geopolitical power. The EU would have to abandon some of its core principles to go down this road. Would it really be worth it?

The Author is Director of the Centre for European Policy Studies.

Related Articles

Europe Day 2020: Calendar of Events Celebrating the Day

On 9 May 1950, the Schuman Declaration was presented, a document that is considered as the first step in the creation of the European...

Respirators and Monitors Worth 4.5 Million euros from the EU and Norway

100 intensive care monitors, 50 anaesthesia and respiratory monitoring apparatus and 70 respirators were bought together by the European Union and Norwegian Embassy to...

Pandemic, Climate Change and EU Engagement In the Region

After the Crisis, the Time Will Come to Rebuild Better

The COVID-19 crisis further emphasises the importance of the Western Balkans' embracing values set by the European Green Deal, and making a shift in...

EU announced over €3.3 billion of support for the Western Balkans

EU reinforces support for the Western Balkans to address COVID-19 crisis and outlines proposal for post-pandemic recovery   The European Commission announced over €3.3 billion of...

Oxygen concentrators arrive as part of EU assistance

Healthcare institutions in Serbia will receive additional assistance in the form of 100 oxygen concentrators, which have arrived today as part of the EU...

More Triage Containers Funded by the EU Installed throughout Serbia

After the first twenty-one containers for triage and emergency care of patients, potentially infected with COVID-19, installed last week in fifteen healthcare institutions, mostly...

EU and Serbia in the joint battle against coronavirus

Prime Minister Ana Brnabić and Head of EU Delegation to Serbia Ambassador Sem Fabrizi had a phone conversation about the situation related to the...

Western Balkans countries joint appeal to the European Commission

Western Balkans countries candidates for EU membership have issued a joint appeal to the European Commission to be exempted from the ban on the...
WordPress Image Lightbox