Comment by Pavle Petrović, President of the Fiscal Council of Serbia

Why is Serbia’s economy growing slower than CEE economies?

CorD Recommends

Zdravko Maksimović, Disaster Risk Reduction Expert

Citizens Represent Our Weakest Link

The capacities of a system are not...

Žarko Petrović, Team Leader on Resilient Development at UNDP Serbia

Flood Prevention Investments Yield Results

Instead of the existing frequency of every...

Economics: What’s New From The 2023 Brics Summit?

Striding Towards a Multipolar Order

The first expansion of the membership of...

Slaviša Orlović Ph.D., Professor at the Faculty of Political Science, author of the book Nadziranje demokratije [Monitoring Democracy]

Reputation Is More Important Than Ever

The media knows how to both create...

Tourist Taxes in Amsterdam to Become the Highest in Europe

City leaders in Amsterdam have announced a significant increase in tourist taxes, positioning them as the highest in Europe....

Swiss-Serbian Chamber of Commerce-Holycode Working Lunch

Swiss-Serbian Chamber of Commerce SSCC held a working lunch entitled ’’The update of the Swiss start-up ecosystem’’ co-organised with...

Flutter Acquires Majority Stake of MaxBet for €141 Million

The world's largest online betting company, Flutter, has secured a majority ownership in MaxBet, a leading entity in the...

Record Employment Numbers in Montenegro

Montenegro has recorded its highest-ever employment rate, with the number of employed individuals reaching 258,000 in July, announced Prime...

Google Marks its 25th Anniversary

The world’s foremost internet search engine, Google, celebrated its 25th birthday in grand style, presenting a special logo to...

The Serbian economy has been a growth underachiever for almost a decade, and that is the major structural issue at present. As a result, with respect to its level of development and living standards, Serbia ranks at the very bottom compared to EU countries

Serbia’s GDP per capita (in PPP) is half that of Central and Eastern European countries and a mere third of those of developed Western European countries. While economic theory and empirical research suggest that a country with a lower initial GDP per capita level should systematically grow faster than more developed economies, due to the catch-up effect, this is not what we observe in Serbia. Quite the opposite in fact: GDP growth has actually been significantly lower than growth in CEE countries since 2010, which only served to further increase the existing gap between Serbia and these countries.

But why is Serbia failing to catch up to more developed European countries, even though it should be doing so, i.e. why is Serbia’s economy growing slower than those of CEE economies, even though convergence dictates otherwise? The answer appears to be threefold: deficient institutions (specifically lacking on the rule of law and control of corruption), a low level of public and private investments, and the gap in educational achievement that hampers Serbia’s long-term economic growth prospects.

The broader reform of social and economic fundamentals is needed if Serbia is to achieve its potential growth and eventually catch-up with comparable CEE countries, but some time is needed for that to bear fruit

Serbia scores very poorly when it comes to the quality of institutions in all relevant international studies. As troubling as it is that the country is lagging behind comparable countries, it is even more troubling that the trend has reversed since 2014: from gradual improvement on the control of corruption and the rule of law to their deterioration. Furthermore, Serbia is investing only about 18% of its GDP, which is 5-6 p.p. lower than it should be, considering the country’s level of economic development and investments in comparable CEE countries.

It is estimated that Serbia is currently growing at two percentage points below its potential long-term growth rate: above 3% instead of around 5%. The greatest single negative impact on economic growth (almost 1 p.p.) comes from underperforming institutions, while the rest can be attributed to low investment level (0.7 p.p.) and a poor education system (0.2 p.p.). These factors, thus, almost entirely explain Serbia’s aforementioned GDP growth gap.

On top of these underlying, structural issues facing the Serbian economy, some current problems have brought additional uncertainties in 2019. Specifically, solid economic growth totals of 4.3% in 2018 mask the worsening macroeconomic trends in the second half of the year. Certainly contributing to this to some extent was the slowdown in the growth of large European economies, but it was primarily due to domestic factors, such as a sharp decline in EPS’ production of electricity that started in August 2018. The Government has thus far failed to respond adequately to these unfavourable short-term trends.

Although the slowdown in the second half of 2018 was evident, the Government missed an opportunity to compensate for it in 2019 by increasing public investments in infrastructure and allowing for larger reductions in the tax burden on private sector wages. Instead, the priority was given to excessive wage growth in the general government and the procurement of equipment for the military and police. Similarly, the Government of Serbia has yet to react to the obvious problems at EPS that led to a tangible drop in GDP growth rates for the second time in the past two years.

These policies – increasing its own investment and reforming EPS and other public enterprises – are the main tools at the government’s disposal for supporting short-term GDP growth. The broader reform of social and economic fundamentals is needed if Serbia is to achieve its potential growth and eventually catch-up with comparable CEE countries, but some time is needed for that to bear fruit. The main pillars of such reform should be improving the currently very poor business climate (i.e. control of corruption and the rule of law) and the poor quality of basic infrastructure in Serbia, while raising the country’s current low credit rating could also stimulate private investments.

Related Articles

Chief Economist Of The Fiscal Council

We’re Weakened As We Enter A Year Of Uncertainty

Despite being exhausted significantly by the health crisis, fiscal policy will have to play an important role, and perhaps a key role, in mitigating...

Pavle Petrović, President Of The Fiscal Council Of Serbia

Poor Institutions Inhibit Economic Growth

The possible higher-than-expected economic growth in 2021 is good news, but isn’t also an indicator of a sustainable trend. Serbia needs far better quality...

Traditional meeting of SAM and the Fiscal Council of Serbia

Macroeconomic and fiscal developments and expected trends in 2019, measures that Serbia should implement in order to generate economic growth and opportunities for SME...

Sebastian Kurz, Chancellor of Austria

The Balkans Impact Austria Directly

Any solution (for Kosovo) needs to have the support of the major powers, particularly the permanent members of the Security Council. We have an...

Matthew Palmer, U.S. Department of State

United States Does Not Offer Ready-Made Solutions

The process and the agreement itself should be locally-owned; only in this way can it be durably implemented in both Kosovo and Serbia....

Choe Hyoung-chan, Korean Ambassador to Serbia

Complete Denuclearisation for Peace on the Korean Peninsula

No more provocative testing of missiles or nuclear weapons by North Korea and a level of continued cooperation between the South and North are...

Health Insurance

Do We Have the Right Medicines?

Every time we hear that patients in the region have access to much more advanced medicines than us in Serbia, despite paying the same...