Sitemap

Beijing Olympics: What Could A Diplomatic Boycott Achieve?

CorD Recommends

Serbia Appoints New Ambassadors to Sweden, Venezuela, Brazil, and Libya

Serbia has announced the appointment of four...

Chinese Firms Lead as Serbia’s Top Exporters

Three Chinese companies have emerged as the...

FIC Presented the White Book 2023

The Council of Foreign Investors (FIC) presented...

Serbia Urged to Accelerate Reforms for EU Integration, as Praised by EU Ambassador

Emanuele Gioffre, the European Union's Ambassador to...

Milan Radulović Awarded French Order of Arts and Letters

Milan Radulović, the director of the Music Youth of Novi Sad and the Novi Sad Music Festivities, has been...

Swedish High-Tech Electric Ferry Sets New Public Transport Standard

Cities worldwide view clean and efficient public transportation as a key strategy for reducing carbon emissions.  For cities with...

Celebration Of 115 years Of Diplomatic Relations Between Egypt and Serbia

On Thursday, November 23, the Slavija Fountain in Belgrade was illuminated with the colors of the Egyptian flag, in...

Serbia and Cyprus Strengthen Ties with Three New Cooperation Memorandums

In a significant diplomatic event held in Belgrade, the governments of Serbia and Cyprus have inked three memorandums of...

Serbia Appoints New Ambassadors to Sweden, Venezuela, Brazil, and Libya

Serbia has announced the appointment of four new ambassadors, following a decree issued by President Aleksandar Vučić.  The Ministry of...

Calls for a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Olympics over China’s human rights abuses are growing louder. What can this form of protest achieve, and what are its limits?

A potential diplomatic boycott hangs over the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing 10 weeks ahead of the opening ceremonies.

The United States and the United Kingdom have said they are considering not sending high-level government officials to the Games in protest against ongoing human rights abuses in China. Calls for other countries to do the same are growing louder.

“We will see non-governmental organizations speaking out more intensively in the coming months, increasing the pressure on national governments,” Jürgen Mittag, a sports policy expert at the German Sports University in Cologne, tells DW.

Mittag expects the boycott discussion to peak in mid-January. Then, he says, “we will be able to see whether there really is concerted action, that is, whether a larger number of heads of state and government will not be there.

“In that case, the Olympics would certainly be damaged,” he continues, “and the Chinese government would not achieve what it actually hoped to gain from these Games: a positive presentation and thus, above all, stronger support of the country.”

Previous boycotts of sporting events

There is a long tradition of boycotts and threats of boycotts at Olympic Games for political reasons. Spain, the Netherlands and Switzerland, for example, did not participate in the 1956 Summer Games in Melbourne in protest against the invasion of Hungary by Warsaw Pact troops.

In the 1960s and 70s, sub-Saharan African countries repeatedly prevented the then-apartheid states of South Africa and Rhodesia from competing with threats of boycotts.

Sports policy expert Jürgen Mittag from the German Sports University in Cologne

Following Russia’s occupation of Afghanistan at the end of 1979, 42 countries boycotted the 1980 Games in Moscow. Russia and 19 other countries returned the favor four years later by staying away from the Los Angeles Games.

In 1988, North Korea sent no athletes to the Games in the South Korean capital of Seoul, with five other countries joining in. There were also calls to boycott the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing because of human rights violations in Tibet, but little actual action came from those appeals.

How effective is a diplomatic boycott?

By comparison, a diplomatic boycott, sometimes called the politician boycott, seems like a “light” version of not sending participants to the Olympics, but only at first glance.

“In the end, depending on the intensity of this boycott, the major event may well be damaged to a certain degree,” sports policy expert Mittag tells DW.

At the 2012 European Football Championship in Poland and Ukraine, the members of the European Commission, the EU’s executive branch, and many European heads of government turned down all invitations to matches in Ukraine to protest the imprisonment of the then opposition politician, Yulia Tymoshenko.

In contrast, the absence of former German President Joachim Gauck from the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi made headlines in Germany but hardly made a dent internationally. Gauck justified his refusal by citing human rights violations in Russia.

A diplomatic boycott becomes more effective the more governments take part, says Mittag, especially when dealing with countries like Russia or China.

“China is a world political heavyweight, a global power,” he tells DW. “In this case, one will think relatively carefully about the extent to which one initiates a diplomatic boycott because it is to be feared that China will retaliate with counter-reactions elsewhere. That can lead to inconveniences that you don’t necessarily want to incur.”

A protest against the Beijing Winter Olympics in Sydney, Australia

Putting pressure on China

According to Amnesty International, the human rights situation in China has not improved since the 2008 Summer Games. The recent case of tennis player Peng Shuai appears to back up that assertion.

The human rights organization calls on “foreign governments to use the 2022 Winter Olympics to highlight the dramatic human rights situation and demand the sustained improvement to which the Chinese authorities have committed,” says Dirk Pleiter, China expert at Amnesty Germany, adding that such measures did not necessarily need to include boycotts.

The European Parliament already called on EU governments in early July to “decline invitations for government representatives and diplomats to attend the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics unless the Chinese government demonstrates a verifiable improvement in the human rights situation in Hong Kong, the Xinjiang Uyghur Region, Tibet, Inner Mongolia and elsewhere in China.”

Mittag sees the Winter Games in Beijing and the subsequent World Cup in Qatar as a “litmus test” for the EU. 

“The EU has made sports diplomacy a priority and has developed it into a targeted instrument, but has not yet really worked with it or only to a very limited extent,” he says.

Related

Here Are The 10 Biggest Economies In The World — Before The Pandemic vs. Now

The Covid-19 pandemic has shaken up the ranking of the world’s largest economies after sending many countries into their worst economic recessions in recent...

China Debuts World’s Fastest Train

A maglev bullet train that can reach speeds of 600 kilometers per hour (373 miles per hour) has made its debut in Qingdao, China.Developed by...

The discussion about rainbow lighting during football’s European Championships earlier this year showed how intensively human rights are now on the sports agenda, he said.

“The relationship between sport and politics is currently being reset, renegotiated,” says Mittag. “What direction this path will take and where it will end is not yet clear.”

A diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Winter Games could provide the first clues.

Source: dw.com

Related Articles

Chinese Firms Lead as Serbia’s Top Exporters

Three Chinese companies have emerged as the top exporters in Serbia, according to the latest data released by the Serbian Ministry of Finance.  As of...

China Activates the World’s Fastest Internet Connection

In a significant technological feat, China has successfully activated the world's fastest internet connection, boasting an astonishing data transfer capacity of 1.2 terabits per...

AI Poses Potential Catastrophic Risk, Warns Bletchley Declaration Signed by 28 Nations

Artificial Intelligence (AI) poses a potentially catastrophic threat to humanity, according to the Bletchley Declaration signed by 28 countries, including the United States, EU,...

173 Types of Minerals Discovered in China Since 2022

Since 2022, a staggering 173 types of minerals have been identified in China, as reported by the Chinese Ministry of Natural Resources at the...

Chinese Ambassador Highlights Deep Spiritual Bond with Serbia

In a reception marking the successful completion of the Third Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation and his own appointment in Serbia, Chinese...

Xi Jinping Hails Serbia as ‘Steel Friend’, Urges Tech and Infrastructure Ties

Chinese President Xi Jinping has termed Serbia a "steel friend" following his meeting with President Aleksandar Vučić. He noted that the bilateral relations between...

Serbia and China Sign Free Trade Agreement

Serbia and China have formalised their economic ties in Beijing by signing four pivotal documents, the most notable being the Free Trade Agreement. This...

Ambassador Li Ming: China Emerges as Serbia’s Main Source of Foreign Investment

Over the past decade, Chinese investments in Serbia have surged 60-fold, establishing China as the primary foreign investment source in Serbia, shared the country's...