Sitemap

Comment by Pavle Petrović, President of the Fiscal Council of Serbia

Why is Serbia’s economy growing slower than CEE economies?

CorD Recommends

Ivan Vejvoda, political scientist and permanent fellow of the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna

Wake-Up Call for the Judiciary

The protests in Serbia are a profound...

Dr Miloš Vojinović, Institute for Balkan Studies of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts

Time of Great Unease

Despite the differences that define the ongoing...

Feature

Trump’s Crypto Revolution

Trump’s administration has launched an unprecedented overhaul...

Comment

Bridges That Build the Future

By building on existing bilateral ties and...

New Leadership for Serbia’s FIC

On February 12, 2025, the Foreign Investors Council (FIC) of Serbia elected a new leadership team. Dr. Ronalnd Seeliger,...

The Grand Reopening of The Bristol Belgrade

The Bristol Belgrade has officially reopened after an extensive two-and-a-half-year restoration, seamlessly combining its storied past with modern luxury. Renowned...

European Motorcycle Sales Surge in 2024

In 2024, Europe's five largest motorcycle markets saw a notable increase in sales, fueled by the demand for urban...

A New Front in the Trade War

President Donald Trump’s decision to impose 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports is stirring fresh tensions, particularly with...

Swiss-Serbian Chamber Elects New Board

The General Assembly of the Swiss-Serbian Chamber of Commerce was held on 5th February 2025 at the premises of the...

The Serbian economy has been a growth underachiever for almost a decade, and that is the major structural issue at present. As a result, with respect to its level of development and living standards, Serbia ranks at the very bottom compared to EU countries

Serbia’s GDP per capita (in PPP) is half that of Central and Eastern European countries and a mere third of those of developed Western European countries. While economic theory and empirical research suggest that a country with a lower initial GDP per capita level should systematically grow faster than more developed economies, due to the catch-up effect, this is not what we observe in Serbia. Quite the opposite in fact: GDP growth has actually been significantly lower than growth in CEE countries since 2010, which only served to further increase the existing gap between Serbia and these countries.

But why is Serbia failing to catch up to more developed European countries, even though it should be doing so, i.e. why is Serbia’s economy growing slower than those of CEE economies, even though convergence dictates otherwise? The answer appears to be threefold: deficient institutions (specifically lacking on the rule of law and control of corruption), a low level of public and private investments, and the gap in educational achievement that hampers Serbia’s long-term economic growth prospects.

The broader reform of social and economic fundamentals is needed if Serbia is to achieve its potential growth and eventually catch-up with comparable CEE countries, but some time is needed for that to bear fruit

Serbia scores very poorly when it comes to the quality of institutions in all relevant international studies. As troubling as it is that the country is lagging behind comparable countries, it is even more troubling that the trend has reversed since 2014: from gradual improvement on the control of corruption and the rule of law to their deterioration. Furthermore, Serbia is investing only about 18% of its GDP, which is 5-6 p.p. lower than it should be, considering the country’s level of economic development and investments in comparable CEE countries.

It is estimated that Serbia is currently growing at two percentage points below its potential long-term growth rate: above 3% instead of around 5%. The greatest single negative impact on economic growth (almost 1 p.p.) comes from underperforming institutions, while the rest can be attributed to low investment level (0.7 p.p.) and a poor education system (0.2 p.p.). These factors, thus, almost entirely explain Serbia’s aforementioned GDP growth gap.

On top of these underlying, structural issues facing the Serbian economy, some current problems have brought additional uncertainties in 2019. Specifically, solid economic growth totals of 4.3% in 2018 mask the worsening macroeconomic trends in the second half of the year. Certainly contributing to this to some extent was the slowdown in the growth of large European economies, but it was primarily due to domestic factors, such as a sharp decline in EPS’ production of electricity that started in August 2018. The Government has thus far failed to respond adequately to these unfavourable short-term trends.

Although the slowdown in the second half of 2018 was evident, the Government missed an opportunity to compensate for it in 2019 by increasing public investments in infrastructure and allowing for larger reductions in the tax burden on private sector wages. Instead, the priority was given to excessive wage growth in the general government and the procurement of equipment for the military and police. Similarly, the Government of Serbia has yet to react to the obvious problems at EPS that led to a tangible drop in GDP growth rates for the second time in the past two years.

These policies – increasing its own investment and reforming EPS and other public enterprises – are the main tools at the government’s disposal for supporting short-term GDP growth. The broader reform of social and economic fundamentals is needed if Serbia is to achieve its potential growth and eventually catch-up with comparable CEE countries, but some time is needed for that to bear fruit. The main pillars of such reform should be improving the currently very poor business climate (i.e. control of corruption and the rule of law) and the poor quality of basic infrastructure in Serbia, while raising the country’s current low credit rating could also stimulate private investments.

Related Articles

Traditional meeting of SAM and the Fiscal Council of Serbia

Macroeconomic and fiscal developments and expected trends in 2019, measures that Serbia should implement in order to generate economic growth and opportunities for SME...

Sebastian Kurz, Chancellor of Austria

The Balkans Impact Austria Directly

Any solution (for Kosovo) needs to have the support of the major powers, particularly the permanent members of the Security Council. We have an...

Matthew Palmer, U.S. Department of State

United States Does Not Offer Ready-Made Solutions

The process and the agreement itself should be locally-owned; only in this way can it be durably implemented in both Kosovo and Serbia....

Choe Hyoung-chan, Korean Ambassador to Serbia

Complete Denuclearisation for Peace on the Korean Peninsula

No more provocative testing of missiles or nuclear weapons by North Korea and a level of continued cooperation between the South and North are...

Health Insurance

Do We Have the Right Medicines?

Every time we hear that patients in the region have access to much more advanced medicines than us in Serbia, despite paying the same...

Dejan Nikolić, Belgrade Marathon Director

Year of Recognition and Obligation

As in each of the previous 31 years, the build-up to this year’s 32nd Belgrade Marathon again sees its director, Dejan Nikolić, and all...

Giuseppe Conte, Italian Prime Minister

Sincere Friendship Binds Our Peoples

With this mission I wanted to confirm the priority attention that Italy reserves to Serbia and also the importance of the stability of the...