Vladimir Gligorov, Economist And Political Analyst

Scientist Losing or Gaining Time

By Daron Acemoglu and And Simon Johnson, MIT

What’s Wrong With ChatGPT?

Artificial intelligence is being designed and deployed...


New Challenges Seek Courageous Responses Comment

Although Montenegro’s potential to attract foreign investments...


Why Japanese Companies Are Getting Serbian Addresses

After many years during which bilateral relations...

Comment by Zoran Panović

Confusion & Hypocrisy

American dictionary publisher Merriam-Webster declared “gaslighting” the...

MPC Properties Appoints Pınar Yalçınkaya As The New CEO

MPC Properties, one of the most experienced real estate companies in the SEE region with its business grounded in...

American Ajay Banga The Only Candidate For The New President Of The World Bank

The U.S. candidate, Ajay Banga, an American of Indian origin, is the only one nominated to succeed the current...

Zoran Knežević Is The New President Of SANU

Academician Zoran Knežević was elected at the election session as the new president of the Serbian Academy of Sciences...

Minister Mali and Finnish Ambassador Lahdevirta Discuss  Implementation Of The Green Agenda

The Vice-President of the Government of the Republic of Serbia and Minister of Finance Sinisa Mali spoke with the...

Russian Diesel Exports On Track To Break Record Despite EU Sanctions

According to Bloomberg, Russian diesel exports are on track to hit a record this month despite European Union sanctions...

The answer to the first question is not very difficult to determine. The government, or rather the prime minister, foresees that the risk of losing elections will be higher in two years than it is now. In part that is because of the growing opposition to the government’s programme – opposition that has already prompted it to either delay some measures, it wanted to adopt or give up on them altogether.

In such a situation, government persistence in pushing through its programme increases the risk of losing the regular elections, and if it continues with delays and compromises, then it will quite probably lose the regular elections anyway. Thus, winning early elections strengthens its mandate and gives it more time to put its programme to work.

The opposition is not only outside of the ruling coalition, the ruling parties, and the government but also within all of them. There are other ways available to consolidate them behind the prime minister and the government’s programme, but again those may be riskier and less efficient than early elections. An election victory will free the hand of the prime minister to reshuffle the government and the governing coalition, and to consolidate his hold over his own party.

In addition, if indeed the results of local and provincial elections turn out to be better for the PM’s party, their control will be increased, as will his ability to govern and push his agenda through.

If that is how the triple election results turn out, then the planned reforms, i.e. those agreed with the IMF and those agreed with the European Commission, will be accelerated rather than being delayed. They will not be implemented during the election campaign, but they will face less sustained opposition if the results of the elections are favourable to the prime minister, his party, and their coalition partners. So, rather than losing time, the government will effectively gain time to put its intended reforms into effect.

Whether time is indeed gained rather than lost depends in part on the electoral strategy of the opposition. They can determine the agenda of the electoral debate

Whether time is indeed gained rather than lost depends in part on the electoral strategy of the opposition. They can determine the agenda of the electoral debate. There is no doubt that the Eurosceptic and pro-Russian opposition will aim to make the main topic of the elections the choice between EU accession and closer ties with Russia. Kosovo and its independence will be their main criterion of choice.

The democratic – social, liberal, left – opposition should adopt an electoral strategy which might give them a fair chance to win the next elections, rather than these early ones. In that case, they should argue for a better reform strategy than the one the government is pursuing and insist elections are to be about the quality and speed of change required to improve the economic, social, legal, and general institutional performance. The aim should be to hold the governing parties, and ultimately the PM, responsible for delays, half-measures, or outright failures during their new mandate, at the next elections.

What are these reforms that the new government needs to commit to? There are two sets of reforms that represent the key to better economic performance. One is the thorough shake-up of the public sector, which needs to be much more efficient and freed from loss-making enterprises and corrupt state aid in its many forms.

The other is financial consolidation, which mostly involves dealing with the high share of nonperforming loans in the banking sector. Those have invited subsidies, where they should not be offered, and have sapped the ability of banks to lend to new businesses, especially SME start-ups. The measures necessary to deal with these issues have been delayed, and these delays have in turn mobilised opposition to these changes.

Clearly, these reforms will benefit from regional cooperation and EU support via the accelerating of the accession negotiation process. So, commitment to both reforms and EU accession should be the outcome of these early elections. In which case, early elections will actually gain time rather than losing it.

Related Articles

How will the Ukraine conflict impact on Serbia’s place in the international community?

Storm In The Backyard

Whenever and however the current conflict in Ukraine comes to an end, there’s no doubt that the Western Balkans and Serbia will be hit...

Vladimir Gligorov, Economist And Political Scientist

Awaiting The Assigning Of Destiny

How political changes will look following contrasting outcomes of the conflict in Ukraine within certain countries, especially Serbia, will depend primarily on political decisions...

Economic Might And Election Results

Everything Still Revolves Around Freedom

Although money buys lots of things and the ruling party uses it to silence the media and bind the fate of citizens to a...

Vladimir Gligorov, Economist And Political Scientist

A Hand In The Budget Replaces Force

The advantage that those in power have – primarily the budget and propaganda – should prevail over political failures and hitherto unprecedented corruption. That...

What Is Serbia’s Foreign Policy Position Like Today?

Syringe And Caprice

On a daily basis, Serbia constructs its image as a skilled player able to easily use its three-pronged or (even) “four-pillared architecture” of foreign...

Dr Vladimir Gligorov, Professor At The Vienna Institute For International Economic Studies

Frozen Interregnum

Frozen conflicts, which are potential sources of instability by their very nature, favour authoritarian rule. So it seems at this moment that the frozen...

What are the pros and cons of the Western Balkans regional economic zone?

Gains Depend on How We Count Them

There’s no doubt that forming a regional market might unshackle intraregional trade and make the Western Balkans a more attractive investment destination. However, there...

Election year 2020 and reforms – Are we already feeling the impact?

Looming Challenges Require Bolder Political Responses

Although Serbia has for years been living in a state of permanent election campaigning, current developments are adding new steam to political dynamics, thus...