Sitemap

By Joseph E. Stiglitz, Jonathan D. Ostry

The IMF Is Still Behind The Times On Capital Controls

Although the International Monetary Fund’s newly revised policy framework on capital controls makes some improvements on what came before, it is still likely to do more harm than good. Real-world experience and advances in economic theory have shown that the IMF’s suspicions about such policies are misplaced

The International Monetary Fund’s revised policy framework for managing cross-border financial flows, approved by its Executive Board last month, broadens the circumstances under which countries may restrict capital inflows. Unfortunately, it also ties countries’ hands excessively and fails to contend with the myriad real-world contexts in which the proffered IMF advice is, or is not, appropriate. So, while volatile capital flows already pose an ongoing challenge for many emerging and developing economies, the IMF’s framework will reduce countries’ options for achieving their social objectives and may ultimately make the global economy less stable.

The previous IMF framework, approved in 2012 and known as the “Institutional View” (IV), held that controls on capital outflows were legitimate only when a country was in the throes of a crisis, and that controls on inflows should be used only as a last resort when the country was experiencing a surge in foreign money. The IV was a political compromise, reflecting deep divisions between IMF member states (including some of the largest shareholders) that favoured fully liberalised capital movements, and those (including many emerging and developing economies) that wanted the IMF’s blessing to adopt policies to mitigate volatility.

Some countries opposed the IV not because they disagreed with it, but because they saw it as “overreach”. They worried that the IMF was going beyond the remit defined by its constitution (the Articles of Agreement), which gives countries considerable latitude on capital-control policies, and that a future IMF Board might suddenly change course and try to constrain what countries could do.

Small countries without undervalued currencies neither generate negative externalities nor engage in beggar-thyneighbour policies. Thus, when they are using capital controls, it is usually in circumstances that have little to do with the IMF’s remit

The IMF’s job is to prevent national policies from generating negative international spillovers. The Fund’s founding fathers, John Maynard Keynes and Henry Dexter White, deeply worried about the implications of competitive currency depreciations, emphasised rules against “beggar-thy-neighbour” policies in the IMF’s Articles. More recently, we have seen what can happen when one country’s financial problems spread to others, as occurred during the global financial crisis.

When the IMF’s Articles of Agreement were written, most countries – including today’s advanced economies – used capital controls extensively. The Articles thus did not give the IMF the authority to push for capital-market liberalisation. Moreover, the last attempt to extend the Articles – at the IMF’s 1997 Annual Meeting in Hong Kong – came at the worst moment, just when the Asian financial crisis, precipitated by massive capital outflows, was erupting.

In any case, small countries without undervalued currencies neither generate negative externalities nor engage in beggarthy- neighbour policies. Thus, when they are using capital controls, it is usually in circumstances that have little to do with the IMF’s remit.

Consider the social objective of ensuring affordable housing for the middle class, which many advanced and emerging-market economies have pursued by restricting foreign purchases of domestic real estate. These restrictions do not fall within the IMF’s responsibility, especially if they don’t significantly depreciate the exchange rate or cause salient cross-border financial spillovers. Nonetheless, the IMF recently urged Australia to reconsider a small tax on real-estate inflows to Tasmania (population 541,000), even though the measure could not possibly be macroeconomically significant. And that is just one glaring example among many. Such advice, and related positions involving countries as diverse as Canada and Singapore, undermine the credibility of IMF “surveillance” (monitoring).

The IMF’s revised framework wisely allows for preemptive measures against inflows in some circumstances. The Fund has come to realise that it is unwise to wait until financial imbalances reach a tipping point before doing something about them. This rationale, essentially for preemptive macroprudential regulation, applies as much to imbalances generated by hot money from abroad as it does to those generated by excess borrowing from domestic sources.

The IMF’s Articles of Agreement correctly give wide latitude to member-state governments in deploying capital controls, provided that such policies do not harm other countries in a beggarthy- neighbour fashion. Rich countries have exploited this flexibility to the fullest

But what about the outflow side of the equation? Now that the US Federal Reserve is raising interest rates, this question has become acutely relevant for many emerging markets. Yet the IMF’s new framework oddly sidesteps the issue.

Economists are generally deeply suspicious of outflow controls, due to a concern that such policies are necessarily tantamount to partial expropriation. But the issue is one of policy design and whether the rules of the game are clear and known ahead of time. For example, a pre-announced policy to tax short-term capital outflows (but not longer-duration flows), and to impose more extensive controls in the event of a crisis, could ultimately enhance macroeconomic stability and, in that respect, make foreign investment more attractive. It is part of the IMF’s job to assess whether outflow controls are needed, how their design can be improved and what role they might play within a country.

Conventional wisdom is constantly evolving to account for advances in economic theory, which has clearly demonstrated the prudence of imposing capital controls in certain circumstances. What was taboo in the late 1990s (when the IMF was championing full capital-account liberalisation) differs from what was taboo in 2012 (when the IMF endorsed inflow controls during surges) and in 2022 (when it endorsed preemptive inflow controls).

It seems clear, including to the IMF, that capital-outflow controls might have been desirable as part of its loan to Argentina under former President Mauricio Macri. Without such controls, the IMF was simply allowing international investors to take their money out of the country, leaving Argentina with a $44 billion debt burden and little to show for it. In circumstances such as those that Argentina faced, the IMF should consider not just allowing controls on capital outflows but actually insisting on them.

The IMF’s Articles of Agreement correctly give wide latitude to member-state governments in deploying capital controls, provided that such policies do not harm other countries in a beggar-thy-neighbour fashion. Rich countries have exploited this flexibility to the fullest. The IMF could do worse than to uphold the spirit of its founders.

Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics and Professor at Columbia University, is a former chief economist of the World Bank (1997-2000), chair of the U.S. President’s Council of Economic Advisers and co-chair of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. He is a member of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation and was lead author of the 1995 IPCC Climate Assessment. Jonathan D. Ostry, an incoming professor of the practice of economics at Georgetown University, is a former deputy director at the IMF, where he co-led the team responsible for the Institutional View on Capital Flows, and co-author of Taming the Tide of Capital Flows (MIT Press, 2018)

Related Articles

Comment

Crises Give Birth To New Solutions

Even though we have continuity of government, there’s no doubt that the set of measures the government will have to opt for will differ...

Yulia Ustyugova, IMF Resident Representative For The Republic Of Serbia

Making Difficult Choices Must Be A Key Government Task

Limited policy space and more difficult access to financing means that policymakers will have to be very selective and targeted in their spending and...

IMF Expect Ukraine To Continue Paying Debt

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects Ukraine to continue to pay its foreign debt, an IMF spokesman said. In June, Oleh Ustenko, an adviser to...

Portonovi

Endless Summer Adventures And Relaxation On The Adriatic Coast

Portonovi Resort, a luxurious and unique destination that lies at the heart of the Bay of Kotor, announces the more than exciting summer season...

Comment by Zoran Panović

Era Of (Post)historical Misgivings

The anxious apprehension of HBO show Game Of Thrones, or George R. R. Martin’s original source book, is easy to recognise in today’s era...

Janusz Wojciechowski, European Commissioner For Agriculture

Food Is The Top Security Issue

Putin is using food as a geopolitical weapon and the EU will not stand idle in the face of this aggression. It is crucial...

H.E. Attila Pintér, Ambassador Of Hungary To Serbia

No Stability Without Serbia

I think there is no alternative to full EU membership for Serbia and the Western Balkans. I think we should present the same terms...

How The Ukraine Conflict Will Shape The Serbian Political Scene

Fruitless Elections

The insistence of the international community that Serbia take a clear stance on the conflict in Ukraine could have far-reaching ramifications for the mapping...

More...

Comment

Crises Give Birth To New Solutions

Even though we have continuity of government, there’s no doubt that the set of measures the government will have to opt for will differ...

H.E. Mohamed Abdullahi Ahmed, Ambassador Of Somalia To Serbia

Somalia Is Potentially A Rich Country

Despite the fact that Somalia has experienced a variety of situations over the past 31 years, including civil wars, famine, and international terrorism that...

Comment by Zoran Panovic

Ana, Again

Of course, it’s absurd that, on the day when the gay prime minister received her third mandate, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić simultaneously cancelled the...

Bojan Klačar, Executive Director Of The Centre For Free Elections And Democracy (CESID)

Open Doors

The return of the opposition to the parliament will lead to numerous changes. The national assembly will once again be pluralistic, with MPS that...

News

Budgets Richer With 85 Million Euros Thanks To Preventing Smuggling

JTI supports the decision of the Government of MNE to prohibit the storage of tobacco in Port of Bar...

Safe Haven For The Economy And Citizenry

I’m extremely proud of the results we’ve achieved in preserving the exchange rate’s relative stability over the course of...

Ambassador Christopher Hill: Serbia Has Made Great Progress

Serbia has made great progress in many fields, including the protection of human rights, said United States Ambassador H.E....

Mathematical Grammar School’s Students The Winners Of Two Bronze Medals At The Informatics Olympics

Students of the Mathematical High School won two bronze medals at the online European Junior Informatics Olympics (EJOI). Bronze medals...

Serbian National Football Team Wins Place In The Elite Rank Of The League Of Nations

The Serbian national football team defeated Norway in Oslo with a score of 2:0 (1:0) with goals from Vlahović...

Ambassador Christopher Hill: Serbia Has Made Great Progress

Serbia has made great progress in many fields, including the protection of human rights, said United States Ambassador H.E....

Mathematical Grammar School’s Students The Winners Of Two Bronze Medals At The Informatics Olympics

Students of the Mathematical High School won two bronze medals at the online European Junior Informatics Olympics (EJOI). Bronze medals...

Serbian National Football Team Wins Place In The Elite Rank Of The League Of Nations

The Serbian national football team defeated Norway in Oslo with a score of 2:0 (1:0) with goals from Vlahović...

Ana Brnabić Attended The State Funeral Of Former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

The Prime Minister of the Republic of Serbia, Ana Brnabić, attended the state funeral ceremony of former Japanese Prime...

European Commission: Serbia Advances Faster Than The EU Average In Innovation

The growth of the performance of the Republic of Serbia in the field of innovation is 15.6 percent in...

Ambassador Christopher Hill: Serbia Has Made Great Progress

Serbia has made great progress in many fields, including the protection of human rights, said United States Ambassador H.E....

Mathematical Grammar School’s Students The Winners Of Two Bronze Medals At The Informatics Olympics

Students of the Mathematical High School won two bronze medals at the online European Junior Informatics Olympics (EJOI). Bronze medals...

Serbian National Football Team Wins Place In The Elite Rank Of The League Of Nations

The Serbian national football team defeated Norway in Oslo with a score of 2:0 (1:0) with goals from Vlahović...

Ana Brnabić Attended The State Funeral Of Former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

The Prime Minister of the Republic of Serbia, Ana Brnabić, attended the state funeral ceremony of former Japanese Prime...

European Commission: Serbia Advances Faster Than The EU Average In Innovation

The growth of the performance of the Republic of Serbia in the field of innovation is 15.6 percent in...